Bengals or Browns...who should be worried?
After watching Cincinnati and Cleveland play the last few weeks and then watching yesterday's game against each other, who do you think should be more concerned about next season, the Bengals or the Browns? yoak-How can you say they need to trade Housh? He's the only one that has been competing and looking decent. He is the one to keep. I can see trading Chad, but not Housh. John L. makes several good points. Mike Brown is a joke of an owner. Bottom line: The Browns were 10-6 last year with a load of potential for this season. They blew it and now they are starting over next year. Cincy has been destroyed by injuries (again) so I cannot say they are in trouble for next year. A few tweaks here and there and they are competitors again. Cleveland can't even decide on a starting quarterback in week 16. Barring any major turnarounds and player movement, the Browns have more reasons to be concerned about the 2009 season.
The Browns.
They actually had potential. That team is a complete mess and needs to fire most of their staff and start fresh.
Cincinnati Bengals vs Cleveland Browns mascot battle
